Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/W27DH-D
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- W27DH-D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Merging W27DH-D with the Innovate list of stations is like removing WUCU-LD! After this page closes, it's a delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BMarGlines (talk • contribs) 13:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Indiana. Shellwood (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The deletion rationale makes little sense, but it's an obvious GNG fail out of the 140-station failed HC2 stations AfD. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
- I agree, Sammi Brie. BMarGlines (talk) 13:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete A TV station that was likely not even viewed outside testers in its only time on the air and never originated any local programming. It's a failed test station among many of HC2's licenses. Nate • (chatter) 00:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Agree that this fails WP:GNG. User:Let'srun 19:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.