Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priyanka Sinha Jha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 13:11, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Priyanka Sinha Jha

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Priyanka Sinha Jha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable person, fails WP:GNG. Created by a 1 article writer (indicates WP:COI or possibly paid writing). Most of the references are links to articles written by her or from non-notable sources or brief mentions. Jupitus Smart 14:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 14:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 14:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 14:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

• Delete- Fails GNG.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
• Keep - Passes GNG. Needs improvement though. Berrocca Addict (talk) 18:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:JOURNALIST due to a lack of in-depth information. The subject seems to be a run-of-the-mill critic/editor/journalist, with very little information about them. Indeed, most of the scant information that can be found is related to the subject's book, which itself is non-notable, and so the Jha likely does not meet WP:AUTHOR either. Two other points should be noted; one is that as a journalist Jha's name appears in articles that she authored (these would constitute mentions in passing or trivial mentions, as said articles are not directly about her). The second is that (per nom) that article may be fatally tainted by promotional material.--SamHolt6 (talk) 13:48, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.